Friday, June 24, 2011

wedding dresses 2009

images style wedding dresses 2009 wedding dresses 2009. wedding dresses 2009. wedding
  • wedding dresses 2009. wedding


  • logiclife
    09-25 12:07 PM
    Your rights as a participant of a bulletin board or online forum like Immigration Voice forums:



    The rights of bloggers (site admin, site owner or site moderators), their liability and section 230. Section 230 refers to Section 230 of Title 47 of the United States Code (47 USC � 230) (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/230.html). To learn the plain English language explanation of this section, go here: http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-230.php (http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-230.php)

    What this means is that whenever someone posts anything against anyone, Immigration Voice is immune from libel suits or defamation lawsuits, with couple of exceptions (discussed in item 2). Therefore, any anonymous poster saying bad things about their lawyers, employers, or anyone else DOES NOT HAVE TO BE DELETED. Other than couple of exceptional scenarios (see point # 2), we are not liable for content posted by users of message boards, forums, discussion boards etc. Section 230 protects Immigration Voice website administrator and moderator against libel suits or other lawsuits caused by participants who post messages against their lawyers, employers or anyone else. A recent example of such a case is illustrated in 22 page opinion of a federal judge in DiMeo V Max (http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1149152717145).

    Immigration Voice is not going to delete, edit or moderate the posts and threads posted by our members no matter how defamatory or criticizing they are. That�s because A) Immigration Voice is not liable for what our members do or not do per section 230 and B) Immigration Voice needs to give freedom to members to vent out against the incompetent immigration lawyers and/or dishonest employers because that is what makes us unique and different from censored forums and it is the ESSENCE of this bulletin board.


    The exceptions when Section 230 protections won�t work.Section 230 will not protect Immigration Voice if site moderators and administrators themselves post content that causes damages to others. We (site admin and moderators) will not edit or delete posts that say bad things about other orgs or persons - no matter how derogatory or defamatory they are against some lawyers, employers etc. We are not liable or responsible for them and legally it�s best and safest for moderators/site admins to leave those posts alone. Besides, that is one reason why people come to this site � freedom to vent out without any censorship, sometimes even against the Immigration Voice leadership and core group.

    The other scenario when the section 230 wont protects us is in case of intellectual property. So don�t post any patented information or technology details on this website. However the laws give us a lot of latitude when we post some news articles or other content created by other sources. More details of intellectual property are here on this link. http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-ip.php (http://www.eff.org/bloggers/lg/faq-ip.php).



    Are we obligated to provide information to plaintiffs about our anonymous posters?First of all, most of the time, we ourselves don�t know the anonymous posters and who they are. The most we can do is provide IP address. Those IP addresses too are not easy to pin down in certain kinds of network environments. However, we will not give any information about our members to anyone unless and until we are subpoenaed for it. Subpoenas are either issued by law enforcement or by plaintiffs who file the lawsuit. Unless we are subpoenaed, we don�t have to give away any information like IP or email of any anonymous poster. Immigration Voice will never make the IP address or any information available to anyone unless it is ordered by court. Immigration Voice will use all possible legal avenues to protect the privacy and anonymity of its members and online discussion participants.


    What if someone with deep pockets sues Immigration Voice with the objective of shutting us down, even though they know they don�t have a case, but want to sue us just to drag us into expensive court battle and make us bankrupt?There is nothing that protects Immigration Voice (or any such website with discussion boards and forums) from frivolous lawsuits. Anyone can sue anyone else, whether he or she lose or win is a different matter. Section 230 protects immigration voice from libel lawsuits resulting from anonymous participants posting messages that cause damages to organizations or individuals. They are even more counterproductive for the plaintiff if that state has ANTI-SLAAP laws.

    SLAAP means �Strategic lawsuit against active participation�. If someone sues us just to make us bankrupt and shut us down without caring for outcome of the case, then it�s a SLAAP lawsuit. The objective is such lawsuit is not to win but to drag the other party into expensive court battle and make them bankrupt. Some states have laws against SLAAP lawsuits called ANTI-SLAAP laws. They are different in every state. What those laws do in general is make the plaintiff of SLAAP lawsuit pay the defendant for the cost of litigation and defense if they lose. So if someone from state that has ANTI-SLAAP laws sues us, then the money we spend on litigation would have to be paid by plaintiffs if they lose. Therefore there is good chance of finding a pro-bono lawyer because if they win, they get paid from the other party. What this means is that it�s difficult to drive someone to bankruptcy with frivolous lawsuits if the state has good ANTI-SLAAP laws. California is one example. Therefore the chances of us getting sued by someone in CA are lesser than other states.

    Should any party sue Immigration Voice for libel based on posted messages on online forums, Immigration Voice will fight back to the fullest extent and will not remove posts or threads against those organizations.


    What should one do if they have been badly hurt due to incompetence or malfeasance on the part of employer or lawyers?Immigration Voice will neither encourage nor discourage members to post messages against their employers or lawyers or any other party. Members and participants are free to post whatever they want to post. If you lawyer�s actions have hurt you and if you think it�s due to malpractice then you can file a complaint against that lawyer in a state bar. If your employer�s action has hurt you and if you think his actions are illegal, then you can file a complaint against your employer at the department of labor (for wages issues) or other departments for other issues.




    wallpaper wedding dresses 2009. wedding wedding dresses 2009. best wedding dresses 2009
  • best wedding dresses 2009


  • bluekayal
    11-01 05:35 PM
    I am hoping to file I-140 next week or so based on an approved labor with PD of 2004. Any idea if it is possible to tie my Sch A 2006 PD with this older one? Thanks for your input!




    wedding dresses 2009. Wedding Gowns 2009
  • Wedding Gowns 2009


  • beautifulMind
    10-08 04:43 PM
    Came across the same issue and was reffered to a top immigration lawyer who advised as posted by me above

    Thanks GCPool. i will probably go with the 485 EAD to be Safe plus logically it makes sense too to sue 485 EAD because once applied for 485 that is your current status...Infact if you contact the school and tell them you are a 485 adjustee they may cancel your EAD OPT




    2011 best wedding dresses 2009 wedding dresses 2009. Best wedding dresses some
  • Best wedding dresses some


  • mallu
    04-15 10:53 AM
    I got my approval y'day from TSC. This marks the end of GC journey. Been with same employer since Aug 1999 ( 9 Long years...........).

    TSC waking up ?



    more...

    wedding dresses 2009. 2010 Elegant Wedding Gowns 3
  • 2010 Elegant Wedding Gowns 3


  • fatboysam
    05-17 12:39 AM
    I am a software engineer and i do not find my occupation in this list. There is one but it's only for managers. Does it mean i am not eligible by any means ?




    wedding dresses 2009. Preowned Wedding Dresses.
  • Preowned Wedding Dresses.


  • hate_me
    03-21 09:09 AM
    Online status is not always updated and cannot be trusted that much, I recieved my EAD in October and online status still shows as PROCESSING. Have your friend talk to his attorney and employer and ask them if they have recieved I140 denial notice. And anyways your friend needs attorney's help as this is not a general question which can be answered on the forum by everyone. Tell him not to waste time and look at all the options. Good Luck

    Gurus,
    I am writing on behalf of a close friend who is too worried to write it for himself.
    Case:
    He is a July 2007 filer with PD of Nov 2003 and recently had his I485 rejected. Reason - I140 denied and no appeal. However, when he checks his I140 status, it says, its still pending. He had received an RFE on I140 in October 2007 about Employment status and he had submitted all the required evidence. He also is in the same company that filed his labor. The only change he ever made is moving to a new place in the same city. Does anyone have a similar experience? What needs to be done apart from consulting a good immigration attorney? Your advice will be much appreciated.



    more...

    wedding dresses 2009. simple wedding dresses 2009.
  • simple wedding dresses 2009.


  • knowDOL
    06-19 03:39 PM
    Senthil,

    Let me correct my post. If your I140 is approved and if your I485 is pending, you can come back to H1B status and get three years extension. One of my friend changed company after 6 months he god EAD and with new company(microsoft) he applied for H1B extension and his extension is approved for three and spouse is on EAD. So, that area is fluid you can jump from EAD to H1 and H1 to EAD. The rule is in AC21 section 104(c). You can google it and you will know.




    2010 Wedding Gowns 2009 wedding dresses 2009. style wedding dresses 2009
  • style wedding dresses 2009


  • cakewalkr7
    08-20 01:45 PM
    I modified the height instead of the scaleY for the grid and that seemed to work. However I got some unexpected results. When I used the scaleY method all the children in the grid also scaled. But using height left the children's height unaffected. Is this how it should be? It seems strange that the grid below it would slide up as I had hoped yet the upper grid's child textbox and label sizes stay the same and in place.



    more...

    wedding dresses 2009. White Wedding Dresses,Cheap
  • White Wedding Dresses,Cheap


  • shreekhand
    08-17 02:52 PM
    So, the bottom portion of you H1 approval notice (I-797) does not have an I-94 ?

    If not, then doing it in Canada for the first H1 can be a big gamble.




    hair Best wedding dresses some wedding dresses 2009. 8-white-wedding-dresses-2009-2
  • 8-white-wedding-dresses-2009-2


  • MatsP
    January 28th, 2008, 02:51 PM
    I also don't have a Nikon D40x, but I don't think any of this discussion is related to the specific camera model, although some of my discussion relies on you being able to change settings on the camera, and my names of things may be off from what Nikon uses - hopefully I can still get you on the right track.

    It's actually a myth that a longer lens requires a higher aperture. For the same framing, you get the same DOF (Depth Of Field) for the same aperture, whether you use a 600mm telephoto lens or a 4.5mm ultra-fisheye. The only difference is that if you want to fill the frame with a sparrow, you can sit at 10 meters or so with a 600mm, and you need to be touching the sparrow with the lens to get it to fill the fram on a 4.5mm lens. Since most of the time, we don't try to get "eye to eye" with wild sparrows and ultira-fish-eyes, nor take pictures of "everything around you" with a 600mm tele (which would put you half a mile away, or so), it appears that the wide-angle has a bigger depth of field. If you don't beleive me, feel free to place a page of newspaper print at an angle (so that you can see how much of it is in focus), and photograph the exact same bit of text from different distances with the same aperture and different focal length.

    So, smaller aperture (bigger number) will allow more depth-of-field, no matter what lens you use. Wide-angle works well for indoors shots, because it's usually close-up - but I have used my 100mm Macro for some of the shots of my son.

    For "active" shots, you may want to aim for f/5.6 - f/8 or so. ISO 400 or higher helps reduce the look of "flash in dark room" scenario.

    For the other trick when taking action shots of kids, the trick is to use the same settings as the sports photographers: relatively short shutter speed (unless you actually want motion blur as part of the image - in the right place, it's good, in most cases not!), and use "following autofocus" (aka AF Servo or Tracking AF) - this is the part where knowing what Nikon calls it could come in handy - so that the AF is continously focusing on the subject, same as if you were trying to follow a basketball-player as he makes his way across the court to the basket. That way, the camera tries to focus (and uses "computer magic" to PREDICT where the focus should be once the shutter is triggered).

    Third, I think Nikon flashes also support "Second curtain flash", which is definitely the better option for "natural looking light" - this allows the camera to capture the natural light first, the flash the flash, rather than the ohter way around. It should, in theory, make no difference, but I find that it gives a more natural look. Twiddling with the balance between flash and natural light will get you there sooner or later (usually, in my case, later - after son or daughter have finished thinking photography is fun!). The adjustments are:
    - smaller aperture (bigger F-number)
    - faster shutter speed
    - lower ISO number.
    gives more flash. Opposite gives more of the natural light.

    --
    Mats

    --
    Mats



    more...

    wedding dresses 2009. wedding dresses 2009.
  • wedding dresses 2009.


  • Michael chertoff
    04-26 02:35 PM
    Why did we all come to USA?

    Did any of you knew the Green card problems when you came?

    Did you know the problems when you applied for greencard many years ago?

    When was the first time you found out there was a ling wait period and so many problems?

    Brother, just relax. Take a deep breath and try to take a nap.. you will be OK. I can understand your frustration.

    Get well Soon my friend.

    MC




    hot 2010 Elegant Wedding Gowns 3 wedding dresses 2009. Expensive Wedding Dress
  • Expensive Wedding Dress


  • chanduv23
    09-12 03:58 PM
    Just like *ranga*, *billa* also has a story.

    billa went to Texas A and M for his Mechanical Engineering and then moved into a lucrative job at a world famous oil company in Houston. His company has offered him a permanant job and offered to do his Green Card. But they don't know he will be leaving his job to go to Dubai because of Green Card logjam and uncertaainity that prevails.

    Lets help to keep Billa and Ranga in the US. Lets all go to the rally



    more...

    house dresses Wedding Dresses wedding dresses 2009. 2009 beautiful wedding dress
  • 2009 beautiful wedding dress


  • Jaime
    09-12 02:20 PM
    Real Life :

    A friend of mine who went to India's premier institution - IIT in India and then to IIM worked for one of the fortune 100 companies here in the US.
    He got married and decided to move to UK because his equally qualified spouse being on a dependent Visa could not work due to the obsolete rules.
    Both husband and wife are well on thier way to permanent residency in UK.

    Doubly bad for the United States!!!




    tattoo Preowned Wedding Dresses. wedding dresses 2009. Wedding Dresses 2009 - Vera
  • Wedding Dresses 2009 - Vera


  • vxb2004
    05-31 05:53 PM
    Hi,

    I was wondering if anyone was ever able to change from Software Engineer to Technical Marketing Engineer (TME), using the AC21 portability rules. A TME needs similar level of technical skills as that of a Software Engineer, of course used for a different purpose.

    A short description of this role (for those of you who don't know about this role)

    The Technical Marketing Engineer role is exciting and challenging for the employee that enjoys equally working hands on with technology in the lab and marketing this knowledge to customers. Working with marketing, engineering, services and the sales channels

    I really like to consider moving to TME roles. I see this as a first point to moving to Product Manager roles. One could move to Product Manager directly, but I guess the transition for a Software Engineer will be smooth, when he/she goes from Software Engineer -> TME -> Product Manager. The advantage with TME is, you can leverage your technical skills to perform this new role and then gradually hone your marketing/soft skills, to move to the Product Manager position. This is also the input I got from the Marketing Director of one of the reputed firms.

    All looks good, but I am not sure if this transition to TME will be acceptable under the AC21 rules. It would be nice to know if anyone has ever able to do it successfully (without getting any RFEs/rejections). Right now, I have a feeling that I am totally stuck in the Software Engineer role and really like to explore my options.

    Appreciate your thoughts on this


    tpcool,

    Given the fact that ur I-140 is not approved yet, I would wait till the approval before considering any job change.

    Good luck.



    more...

    pictures simple wedding dresses 2009. wedding dresses 2009. Labels: White Wedding Dress
  • Labels: White Wedding Dress


  • gjoe
    01-03 04:38 PM
    I think USCIS process cases based on the I485 RD. The IO gets the file and he approves if everything is ok with the file and assigns a visa number if it is available, they generally don't care about the PD because they don't want to go back and review the same file. They are doing their best to complete work on a file in one go instead of putting it through multiple queues and re-visiting the case again and again. Bottomline they are working effeciently by using their manpower more productively instead of going back and forth on the 1 million I485 files.

    This is my take on the processing statergy used by USCIS. If everything was as mentioned in the manual they would have answered this question in an FAQ like they did for the July'07 receipting updates and FAQ's.

    I maybe wrong, but the trend suggests what I have mentioned.




    dresses Expensive Wedding Dress wedding dresses 2009. Gorgeous wedding dresses next
  • Gorgeous wedding dresses next


  • JunRN
    08-12 03:49 PM
    I think there are few applicants between July 4 to July 17 because this the period of limbo - no one knows what to do and waiting for the August VB. I would guess it would not even reach 10% of those who filed in July 1 to 3.

    Another guess is that the filers for July 20 to 31 are also many but not as many as July 1 to 3 filers.

    I would suspect that there will be many filers before the August 17 deadline and it could be as many as July 1 to 3 filers.



    more...

    makeup White Wedding Dresses,Cheap wedding dresses 2009. dresses Wedding Dresses
  • dresses Wedding Dresses


  • radhay
    05-25 08:47 AM
    My honest suggestion. If you already have a technical degree (BE) it is better to go for business degree. Future is great for people with technical and business skills regardless which country you are in.
    Hi Guys

    I am on H1B, just filed my GC. I am planning to do a masters degree (i am a B.E now). Any suggestions? I was looking at walden university for online programs. are they any good? Is it worth the money spent??

    Thanks! :)




    girlfriend Wedding Dresses 2009 - Vera wedding dresses 2009. Beautiful wedding dress was
  • Beautiful wedding dress was


  • h12gc
    04-29 02:34 AM
    Could any one please answer my questions about my RFE on I 485?

    Thanks
    h12gc




    hairstyles wedding dresses 2009. wedding dresses 2009. Searching for wedding dresses,
  • Searching for wedding dresses,


  • chosenone52
    10-01 09:37 PM
    Hello ,
    First of all, this is a great forum and members are really helpful out here!

    My case is something like this
    Currently I am on h1( completed 1 year) working in construction industry. My profile consist of Bachelors from India and Masters from USA.

    The company I work for is not willing to go ahead with my green card. ( With the economy going south, its not wise to jump). But know a company who liked my profile and is willing to sponsor my green card-EB2. The reason they are not willing to hire now is due to economy, but willing to help me in my GC process before hiring and might pick me up at first opportunity.

    Something like this: I am employed for Company A on h1 and company B is willing to do my paperwork as a future potential employee?

    I had various concerns:

    >> Is green card application based on future employment possible, (as in my situation)?

    >> GC takes 4-5 yrs to process. What if they decide not to hire me?


    >> What are the risk factors involved on my side as well as on Companies side who is sponsoring my GC?


    I know its a complex situation and would appreciate thoughts and comments from all users.

    Thanks




    imind
    03-12 03:50 PM
    You can go to dice.com or any other jobportal and search for any IT job and you will see lot of jobs says:

    NO H1Bs....ONLY EAD/GC/CITIZENSIP .




    sduddukuri
    04-01 02:38 PM
    We went to India and got our visa stamped from chennai. Thank you all for all the help



    No comments:

    Post a Comment